高嘉力

高嘉力律师行成为《2018 年亚太法律 500 强指南》(Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide 2018) 纠纷调解、劳资、重组与破产案件推荐律师事务所

高嘉力律师行成为近期公布的《2018 年亚太法律 500 强指南》推荐律师事务所。高嘉力律师行在纠纷调解、劳资、重组与破产等领域的业务在香港律师事务所中名列前茅。高嘉力律师行在上述核心领域中保持领先地位,获得客户与同行的一致好评。高级合伙人高嘉力再次获得香港纠纷调解领先个人的荣誉。

高嘉力获得2018年《亚洲法律概况》“杰出”评级

《亚洲法律》(Asialaw) 杂志已发布 2018年《亚洲法律概况》(Asialaw Profiles)——亚太地区国内与区域律所评级指南。香港国内律所门类中,高嘉力被评为纠纷解决方案和诉讼门类以及劳动法门类的“杰出”律所。同时还被评为重组与破产清算门类的“强烈推荐”律所。高嘉力和黄启智被评为市场顶级律师,尹安琦被评为顶级律师。

《香港法院:在原则上和实践中支持仲裁》—— 高嘉力 (Nick Gall) 和苏施玛 (Ashima Sood) 为 Practical Law 出版的《2017纠纷调解全球指南》(The Dispute Resolution Global Guide 2017) 香港章节投稿

It is well recognised that the pro-arbitration and pro-enforcement approach of Hong Kong courts is the key attribute that underpins Hong Kong's position as an attractive venue for commercial dispute resolution.Due to the rapid economic growth in the markets and a surge in cross-border transactions, arbitration users across the globe are demanding a robust regulatory framework and a judicial climate that is pro-arbitration. Hong Kong has been successful in recognising these demands both in principle as well as in practice.This article considers:The pro-enforcement approach of courts in Hong Kong in the context of the recent judgment in U v A [HCCT 34/2016]. Other important developments in the arbitration regime in Hong Kong.

高嘉力律师行在《亚太法律服务500强指南》(Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide) (2017年) 中荣获受推荐律师行

高嘉力律师行在最近出版的《亚太法律服务500强指南》(Legal 500 Asia Pacific Guide) (2017年) 中荣获受推荐律师行该律师行在香港地区争议解决、就业、重组和破产领域获得排名。该律师行保持了其在这些核心执业领域作为杰出律师行的排名,并获得了客户和同行的一致好评。资深合伙人高嘉力(Nick Gall) 再次被评为香港争议解决方面的杰出个人。

高嘉力律师行在《亚洲法律概况》(AsiaLaw Profiles) (2017年) 中获得排名

Asialaw 已出版了《亚洲法律概况》(2017),一部旨在推荐亚太地区最好的国内和地区律师行的指南。在香港本地律师行类,高嘉力律师行在其核心执业领域:争议解决、 劳资纠纷和破产清算方面获得“高度推荐律师行”。在个人律师类,高嘉力 (Nick Gall) 被评为“业界杰出律师”, 宝琪敦 (Brooke Holden) 和黄启智 (Chris Wong) 被评为“明日之星律师”。

Employment Newsletter May 2016: Hong Kong Court of Appeal confirms implied term of anti-avoidance in employment contracts

Gall was instructed to act for Sunny Tadjudin against the Bank of America in this landmark employment law case. The “Sunny Case” is considered the leading authority in respect of bonus claims in Hong Kong. In the Bank’s latest appeal, the Court considered the issue of whether an anti-avoidance provision can be implied into an employment contract. This judgment has repercussions for all employers in Hong Kong who pay bonuses, especially those in the financial sector. In line with many other jurisdictions, the Court of Appeal confirmed that it is unlawful for Hong Kong employers to terminate an employee’s employment in order to avoid the employee being eligible for assessment of discretionary bonus and payment. Gall’s employment team, led by Nick Gall (Partner), Andrea Randall (Partner) and Stephen Chan (Senior Associate) report on their recent Court of Appeal victory.